Gameplay Faction formed!


#291

not me? ouch, just ouch bear.

lol


#292

LOL you were my second choice. :innocent:


#293

Well Red will have to represent us both. GO RED GO!


#294

Sshh don’t tell anyone I’m an alien :space_invader:


#295

I hope Gox is there. Love his insight about the game.


#296

In fairness, @TheRedDelilah may be the single biggest proponent of tearing down the sapphire wall, so I think we’re well represented there.

So far, with the players I have seen confirm their membership, I believe it should actually be a fair sampling of credible people… unless @CBAteASandwich is involved - then God help us all.


#297

Honestly none of this matters unless these people are actually listened too, which i doubt. But we will see.


#298

My first order of business will be asking them to increase the cost to breed Obsidian and eliminate timers in all event prizes. That’ll solve the balance issues.


#299

I have to admit that I am not happy with the current state of things and the first thing I want to do is rant but I sincerely hope the people PG chose for this new group carry a sincere desire for the entire community and will try to get the game back to where it was when I started to play almost 3 years ago. Congratulations to those chosen. I hope you guys can have a positive impact in the future of this game for non spenders and new players as well as keeping the game fun and competitive for the big guns. You make the game fun and a goal post for the rest of us.


#300

Oh my goddess!
Which criteria do you used when you’ve been choosing ppl?
Ability to provide detailed feedback about gameplay doesn’t mean,that this person knows anything about the game and his/her opinion means anything.
Parrot also can talk,lol.
You guys better get some good D1 flyers who really can give you some good advices,since they are long time players and spending a lot of time online)
I’m surprised that we don’t have PlayerJ there,i this case,lol


#301

Yes,sir!me too)


#302

Until a non-spending super active grinder confirms he is in the group, then not all parties are represented. Sorry but Red just doesn’t cut it. She has spent a lot in the past and to now consider herself a nonspender isn’t what that part of the community needs. Will she bring insight,sure. Will Warlord and Panda bring insight, absolutely. But where is the grinder in this group?

Why won’t PG release the list of players in it so we can see if it’s a fair sample?


#303

only 10% doubt that could happen.

A riot would occur if PG ignores even the gameplay faction they formed.


#304

I hope there is one in the group (a qualified one), but either way I’m very grateful Red is there. You should be too.


#305

I agree that a true non-spender is needed. I won’t say my larger two accounts make me a non-spender in any way. I was referring to my 166 account to which is a true free account. Sorry for the lack of clarity.

I think there are some free to super low spending people in the group too. I’m 100% positive that there is an Elite Only player (who is a kick ass flier) and a super low spending player (3-5 packs a year tops) if that’s helpful to know.

I think why they won’t release a list is some people don’t really want to share. Perhaps due to messages or whatnot, can’t be sure.


#306

It honestly makes sense why they aren’t releasing a list of names. Can you imagine the spam messing these individuals would likely get, with everybody trying to give them their specific input? Some people like to fly under the radar.

I do wish we could see some metrics like @Jonesy suggested earlier, if nothing else than to let us see general information on the set of players chosen to represent all of us. There are so many unknowns that we can’t really give a full evaluation on how, and if, this will work out.

Again, I think we all need to be patient.


#307

I think there’s still a bit of a difference between running a third account as a non-spender, with all the knowledge from running the first accounts, and being a first-time low-level non-spender. But I do understand that getting a sub-100 first time player like myself in would be of very limited value for most of the topics discussed, and would be a bit much to ask in the first wave. Also I’m pretty confident in people like yourself and @forScience keeping an eye out for the low level interest.


#308

100% agree! This is why I am very passionate about getting reliable guides and information in game for players. I don’t think they should have to hunt and make so many mistakes due to misleading mehanics and such.

I certainly think there is value, but it is limited - I agree. I promise I’ll do my best to represent players of all types.

Also this :heart:


#309

they have been doing it for 3 years. other factions have been created in the past… ALOT more than 10% doubt that.


#310

well, that’s in the past. They are improving bit by bit. Warlord and Red is there so let’s just wait and see what happens.