Instead of boycot lets suggest here reasonable suggestions for pg


#41

They don’t care unless their churn rate is negatively affected. Which is the point of a boycott

And when they to throw us a bone they check the size of it to make sure it’s not too large (cuz apparently agreeing to all reasonable demands is harmful to the game ok pg I see how it is…)


#42

I think it’s intentional so that others can see what dragon it is if they click on it instead of seeing a nickname and getting confused. It’s a shame though, some pretty funny nicknames out there


#43

PG legend says players have massively quit over too large bones before :skull_and_crossbones:


#44

Noooooooo —scrap the fire & ice shards! Convert them all into elemental embers & have done with it! Much simpler than faffing with drop rates…
And black pearls whilst you’re at it!


#45

that could be well


#46

Yet that appears to be the only lesson they have learnt (probably based on some exaggerated/misquoted sources). All other lessons about lying/misrepresenting, overly aggressive monetization, making their player base feel like second class citizens, not investing enough into programming a balanced/relatively stable game, etc have been completely ignored.


#47

I forgot that /s tag, I was completely sarcastic on that one :see_no_evil:

It’s a reference to the thread about the ruby/token/speedup rewards for level ups they have tested in a game wide A/B test where PG ultimately said that too large rewards make players quit.


#48

A graph screen that shows the progression of a teams progress toward reaching the next tier ,whether negative or positive in the league they are in on a weekly updated stasis.