But we are right back to the point of one player shouldn’t be winning the whole battle for a team. I understand your point and don’t argue that in wars like the one you were in that lower players shouldn’t be backed, but a limit on backs or something to that effect still would limit the issues of one player winning the whole war for a team.
It would limit that other team as well as yours. If a team has that high of level of players they need to move up and not be attacking teams with 1 high level player and the rest lower level. I am not sure what the resolution would be but wars the way they are are not fun at the moment.
I am seeing way to many high level players in lower leagues and one high level player backing the entire team.
It is not that a war like that can’t be won, it is more the question of is this team play or one player carrying a whole team? Should a team be winning wars when it is not team play but one player? I mean what fun is there for the one player to back the entire team? Or better yet for the members to swap out and not even do their run but have someone else do it for them?
What are they learning?
They sure aren’t learning team participation or how to fly their dragons on defended bases. It is teaching them that someone else will do it for them.
One of the simplest things we try to teach our children, and turn around as adults and say it is ok to have someone else do it for you.