A PvP-event, as the name suggests, is about player versus player situations.
The attacker gets points for destroying the base - but what about the defender?
The defender has no personal advantage other than possible costs (hammers, shields, swords) and possibly a small amount of loot from killing the dragons (i.e. personal-private advantage; advantage that the player can claim for himself outside the team).
Let’s face it: for five shot down dragons (at best) you get five rubies, 3-minute accelerators and such other small items - the effort is actually not worth it! Therefore something should be changed/introduced here.
My idea here is to give points to the defenders.
Example: The attacker flies to a base that gives him 100 points. The attacker destroys 85% of the base and receives 100 points.
In the subsequent flight against the same base, however, a defender is present who effectively prevents the attack, only 63% are destroyed. The attacker doesn’t get the full 100 points, but only 50 (just a numerical example, I don’t know the exact details). Now the defender should get the difference between the 100 possible points and the number of points actually reached (50) by the attacker, in this case also 50 points.
This procedure should be applied to all attacks (normal attack, super attack, wildfire and mega) and to the use of inner fire.
This also causes the attacker to rethink the attack, after all, if he makes the wrong decision, he can damage his own clan.
At all PvP events, it should be possible to earn points for yourself and your clan through successful defenses.
If there are multiple defenders, the points scored in a successful defense are divided equally (in the example: 50/3 = 16 [fragments are disregarded]), but the sum of the points is credited to the clan.
The idea behind this is that the defenses in PvPs have more influence because they are sometimes neglected and an actual PvP-event is often not a player-against-player but a player-against-"normal basis with supershots without mind ".
PS: It is clear to me that there are people whose (mega) attacks are sacred and who will therefore declare this idea to be dead.
Nevertheless, I ask for a harmonious discussion without insult - thank you!