It’s actually a little less than 47% due to the main attack damage, but I must have written your number off as finding only the difference with the glyph as that was a known value.
But yeah that seems not too bad. For anyone who was operating without buffs this means more than that, but I agree it shouldn’t be too difficult to offset by any player who put the work in to a rider (or money)
Anyone without atlas, i fear would need to use the buffs
Yes but many will legit have pathox and be below the line. It isn’t nearly as bad as I thought. It seems the stacking was proportionally stacked to not impact the break even.
Sorry you feel that way, I’m not ranting, but had purpose. Apologies if you were offended by it, but I’d post it again if it played out the same way again. I’m not a fan of shutting things down with blanket statements and no data, as it turned out everything checked out. 47% isn’t insignificant. I did think it was higher, but it turns out anyone with up to orange tier research for hunters completed and a 30% buff will break even without anything else.
I’d personally reccomend confirming if folks fall under or over that line for anyone complaining rather than just shutting them down. And understand that for a mythic dragon, owners just took up to a 17% value loss compared to other dragons on their flagship mythic dragon. Had it been Gunnar, all 17% would have been buffs, but on pathox it’s only just broken even to where it was before.