It is Spring Revivals functionality that we are questioning, not Healing Marks. More specifically its lack of healing ability when it was advertised as being noticeably stronger than HM (based on the information we the players had at the time). Your changes to Healing mark to ensure it functioned similar to how it did before you made those changes (which i still dont understand why those changes were even needed) is secondary to the fact that SR was advertised as healing DOUBLE what HM does.
In this other thread you don’t address this. Now i don’t expect you to actually double SR’s healing amount. But has PG looked at how well that spell is performing and perhaps more importantly how well its runes are performing?
Take the Epic for example. It adds 12.5% heal gain as an expert rune… when fully boosted and with the most common research SR heals for about 12.5% (the state most people fly their dragons in) which means this rune adds about 1.5% healing when made experted (less with a rider and more research)… Thats next to nothing! Even the Legendary adds only 3% healing (again less with a rider and more research). To add insult to injury these two runes dont have a secondary benefit. Why not?
Has this been looked at? and if so or if not can you share the reasoning for these runes being so weak?